From a parchment motet manuscript of the mid-14th century. Doubtless from the same MS originally, these two folios are now quite separate and do not seem to form adjacent pages. The flyleaves had formerly served as flyleaves/pastedowns for two different fifteenth century volumes, LTK 342 and LTK 348, The smaller of the two fragments was the back flyleaf of LTK 342, an incomplete Dutch translation of the Speculum virginium, whose former shelfmark Theol. 63/22 remains written on this fragment. The larger of the two fragments, was once a flyleaf in LTK 348 according to bibliographic information for this volume, a Dutch devotional miscellany preserved in the same collection.
NL-Lu Fragment L.T.K. 342A
Bibliotheek der Rijksuniversiteit, Leiden, Netherlands
fragments: mid-14th century
| Archive | Bibliotheek der Rijksuniversiteit, Leiden, Netherlands (NL-Lu) |
|---|---|
| Shelfmark | Fragment L.T.K. 342A |
| Image Availability | The images on this record are linked using IIIF. |
| Surface | Parchment |
| Numbering System | Foliation |
| Measurements | 1: 275 x 202; 2: 150 x 202 mm |
| Other Identifiers |
|
| Notations |
|
| External Links | |
| Provenance |
|
| Contents | Contains 4 compositions, 2 from 3 composers, 2 are anonymous. |
General Description
Physical Description
Both leaves are difficult to read on the recto.
Notation
Ars Nova
Ruling
9 or 10 brown five-line staves per page.
Foliation
1-2v
Decoration
red initials
Surface
parchment
DIAMM Note
Sample image:
RISM Description
RISM B/IV 2: One and one half leaves from a parchment motet manuscript of the mid-14th century. Doubtless from the same ms originally, these two folios are now quite separate and do not seem to form adjacent pages. They meas. respectively 275 x 202 mm. and 150 x 202 mm. Both leaves are difficult to read on the recto. (The foliation is mine.) The notation is of Ars Nova type and the text employs red initials. There are 9 or 10 brown five-line staves per page.
This information is reproduced here by kind permission of the publishers. It is COPYRIGHT and copying/reproduction of any of this content without permission may result in legal action.
The inventory could not be loaded.
‡ denotes primary source study
Günther, Ursula (editor). 1965. The Motets of the Manuscripts Chantilly, musée condé, 564 (olim 1047) and Modena, Biblioteca estense, a. M. 5, 24 (olim lat. 568). Corpus mensurabilis musicae, vol. 39. Neuhausen nr. Stuttgart: American Institute of Musicology. Pages: n o. 14 (transcription of Lu 342A 4 after F- CH 564); LVIIff.
Günther, Ursula. 1958. The fourteenth-century motet and its development. Musica Disciplina, 12: 27-58. Pages: 37ff.
Schrade, Leo. 1956. Philippe de Vitry: Some New Discoveries. Musical Quarterly, 42: 330ff. Pages: 354.
Schrade, Leo (editor). 1954 -1956. The Polyphonic Music of the Fourteenth Century. 3 vols. Pages: 1, 91 ff (transcription of Lu 342A 2 after 1-7 V).
Besseler, Heinrich. 1926. Studien zur Musik des Mittelalters: II. Die Motette von Franko von Köln bis Philipp van Vitry. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 8: 137-258. Pages: II, 222, 229.
This form is used to make comments on a source. If you wish to notify us of a correction to the record, you should use the "Contribute a change" form instead.
No comments have been made.
Contributions to this record are recorded here. If you wish to contribute information or a correction to this record, use the "Contribute a Change" link. This will then be reviewed by DIAMM staff and, if accepted, your contribution will be acknowledged here.
Richard Dudas
Tuesday, 21 July, 2020
updated link to sample image
Richard Dudas
Tuesday, 21 July, 2020
updated link to sample image
DIAMM, 2016
Monday, 23 January, 2017
NB: Migrated from old site. Credit for notes may not be completely accurate. General Description; Physical Description Note; Notation Note; Ruling Note; Foliation Note; Decoration Note; Surface Note; DIAMM Note
Répertoire Internationale des Sources Musicales
Monday, 23 January, 2017
NB: Migrated from old site. Credit for notes may not be completely accurate. RISM Description
IIIF Manifest