F-Pnm Latin 909

Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des Manuscrits, Paris, France

Antiphonal with added polyphony: 10th-11th century

Archive Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des Manuscrits, Paris, France (F-Pnm)
Shelfmark Latin 909
Image Availability The images on this record are linked using IIIF.
Surface Parchment
Numbering System Foliation
Measurements 265 x 160 mm
Notations
  • Aquitanian diastematic neumes
Relationships
External Links
Provenance
Contents 1 pieces from 1 composers
General Description

Antiphonal (etc) of the use of Limoges, from the Abbey of St Martial and containing chants etc for St Martial, collected from several earlier manuscripts. One piece on f. 202-205 appears to be in 2vv, although earlier commentators have viewed this as two related but separate settings.

DIAMM, 2022
Binding

orignal 13th century binding with royal arms

DIAMM, 2022
Notation

Aquitanian neumes

DIAMM, 2022

Click an entry to see more information about that item.

Folio / Pages Composition / Item title Source attribution Composers (? Uncertain)
202r–205r Magna virum resonent Domini praeconia ("72 verses on St Martial") - Anonymous
Appears on: 202r–205r
Genres: Sequence
Composer Compositions
Anonymous
Composition Composers (? Uncertain) Folios / Pages
Magna virum resonent Domini praeconia ("72 verses on St Martial") Anonymous 202r–205r
These images are from an external IIIF service and are not hosted by DIAMM.

Images © Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris

denotes primary source study

Ferreira, Manuel Pedro. 2002. Is it polyphony? Revista Portuguesa de Musicologia, 9-34. Notes: description; discussion; facsimile (partial); transcription of polyphony.

Hooreman, Paul. 1949. Saint-Martial de Limoges au temps de l'abbé Odolric (1025- 1040). Essai sur une piece oubliée du répertoire limousin. Revue Belge de Musicologie, 5-36. Notes: discussion; transcription of polyphony (as 2 monophonic settings).

This form is used to make comments on a source. If you wish to notify us of a correction to the record, you should use the "Contribute a change" form instead.

No comments have been made.