US-NYcub Goff N66

Columbia University, Rare Book and Manuscript Library, New York, United States

pastedown: 13th century

Archive Columbia University, Rare Book and Manuscript Library, New York, United States (US-NYcub)
Shelfmark Goff N66
Image Availability DIAMM does not have images of this source. Please refer to the external links for image availability.
Surface Parchment
Numbering System Foliation
Measurements ? x 112 mm
Notations
  • Notre Dame
External Links
Contents 2 pieces from 1 composers
General Description

Parchment bifolio, serving as the front pastedown of a 1488 incunable, containing conductus fragments and originally belonging to the same musical manuscript as fragments in D-F Fragm. lat. VI 41. The two-part Sursum corda on f.1 is concordant with that in D-W Cod. Guelf. 628 Helmst. The end of a three-part Porta salutis ave conductus is partially visible on f.2.

Discovered by Eva Maschke, 2012. Notified by Dominique Gatté, 2022.

DIAMM, 2022

Click an entry to see more information about that item.

Folio / Pages Composition / Item title Source attribution Composers (? Uncertain)
1r–1v Sursum corda elevate dulci corda resonante - Anonymous

Sursum corda elevate dulci corda resonante

Anonymous
Appears on: 1r–1v
Genres: Motet
2r–2v Porta salutis, ave per te patet - Anonymous

Porta salutis, ave per te patet

Anonymous
Appears on: 2r–2v
Genres: Motet
General Note

The lower two voices are concordant with the two-voice versions in Wolfenbüttel and Firenze. In this source a third voice has been added on top.
Composer Compositions
Anonymous
Composition Composers (? Uncertain) Folios / Pages
Porta salutis, ave per te patet Anonymous 2r–2v
Sursum corda elevate dulci corda resonante Anonymous 1r–1v

‡ denotes primary source study

Maschke, Eva M. 2010. Neue Conductus-Fragmente aus dem ehemaligen Dominikanerkloster in Frankfurt am Main. Studi Musicali, 295-312. Notes: source description and images.

This form is used to make comments on a source. If you wish to notify us of a correction to the record, you should use the "Contribute a change" form instead.

No comments have been made.