CZ-Pnm MS XII E 5

Národní muzeum, Prague, Czech Republic

paper MS with music fragments in the binding: 14th century

Archive Národní muzeum, Prague, Czech Republic (CZ-Pnm)
Shelfmark MS XII E 5
Image Availability DIAMM does not have images of this source. Please refer to the external links for image availability.
Surface Parchment
Numbering System Foliation
Measurements 240 x 290 mm
Notations
  • Franconian
External Links
Provenance
  • France
Contents 1 pieces from 1 composers
General Description

Robertus Linconiensis. Opera.

Front and back flyleaves are two parchment leaves containing motets. The flyleaves are unnumbered, and designated I r/v and 165r/v by Gordon Athol Anderson. The contents are an almost complete Latin triple motet, and the remains of two Latin double motets dating from the last third of the 13th century and probably notated c. 1280-1310.

Gordon Athol Anderson, 2011
Binding

Buckle binding

Gordon Athol Anderson, 2011

Click an entry to see more information about that item.

Folio / Pages Composition / Item title Source attribution Composers (? Uncertain)
[-] Flos fit femine / Flos fundavit / Flos firmavit / Flos filius - Anonymous

Flos fit femine / Flos fundavit / Flos firmavit / Flos filius

Anonymous
Appears on: [-]
Genres: Motet
Voice: [no designation]
Languages: Latin
Voice Text: Flos fit femine/Flos fundavit/Flos firmavit/Flos filius
Composer Compositions
Anonymous
Composition Composers (? Uncertain) Folios / Pages
Flos fit femine / Flos fundavit / Flos firmavit / Flos filius Anonymous [-]

‡ denotes primary source study

Horyna, Martin. 2021. On the finding of medieval polyphony in a manuscript at the National Library in Prague under shelf mark V E 15. Clavibus unitis, 5–13. Pages: 12.

‡ Anderson, Gordon Athol. 1982. New sources of medieval music. Musicology Australia: Journal of the Musicological Society of Australia, 1-26. Notes: Second fragment in the article. Includes inventory.

This form is used to make comments on a source. If you wish to notify us of a correction to the record, you should use the "Contribute a change" form instead.

No comments have been made.