E-Mn 20486 (Codex de Madrid)

Biblioteca Nacional, Madrid, Spain

manuscript of polyphony: 13th century

Archive Biblioteca Nacional, Madrid, Spain (E-Mn)
Shelfmark 20486 (Codex de Madrid)
Image Availability DIAMM does not have images of this source. Please refer to the external links for image availability.
Surface Parchment
Measurements 166 x 115 mm
Other Identifiers
  • RISM: Ma
Notations
  • Notre Dame
  • square
Relationships
External Links
Provenance
Contents Contains 100 compositions, 3 from 1 composer, 97 are anonymous.
General Description

A 13th century parchment manuscript containing 142 folios, in format Ma is the smallest of the four principal sources containing the music of the Notre Dame school. Anglès distinguishes 3 copyists: A f. 1-3v, B f. 5-24v and C f. 25-142. The two fragments at the bottom of f. 2 and at the top of f. 3v appear to be 14th century additions.

LudwigR placed the ms chronologically after W1 and F and before W2, and divided the ms into six large sections as follows : I, f. 1-4, a binio containing a conductus, a motet and 2 textless voices ; II, f. 5-24, 2 quinios containing 2 four-part motets and 3 four-part organa; III, f. 25-65, 5 quaternios with an added leaf f. 61, containing 22 two-part conductus; IV, f. 66-106, 5 quaternios with an added leaf f. 105, containing 20 two-part conductus and 8 motets; V, f. 107-122, 2 quaternios containing 10 two-part conductus, a motet and a three-part In seculum; VI, f. 123-142, 2 quinios containing 8 two-part conductus and 23 motets, the majority without T, some with Mot only and some with Tr and Mot only.

It is noteworthy that Ma does not place motets and conductus in separate fascicles.

DIAMM, 2020
Physical Description

The last fascicle is scarcely legible in some places due to the effect of humidity.

DIAMM, 2020
Binding

Bound in parchment in the 18th century

DIAMM, 2020
Notation

square Notre Dame

DIAMM, 2017
Ruling

There are generally 8 or 9 five-line but also 10 four and five-line red staves per page. Staves have been ruled throughout, though ff. 4-4v, 22-24v and 140-142 are blank.

DIAMM, 2020
Decoration

Initials are written in blue or black on a red background, though they are not infrequently missing. The large initial F on f. 25 suggests that this may have been the beginning of the manuscript originally.

DIAMM, 2020
Surface

parchment

DIAMM, 2017
RISM Description

RISM B/IV 1: A 13th century parchment manuscript meas. 166 x 115 mm. and containing 142 folios. The present pencil foliation was added at t.r.r. by Wilhelm Meyer in 1907. 3 extra folios were added to the ms at each end when it was bound in parchment in the 18th century. Anglès distinguishes 3 copyists: A f. 1-3v, B f. 5-24v and C f. 25-142. The two fragments at the bottom of f. 2 and at the top of f. 3v appear to be 14th century additions. Fol. 4-4v, 22-24v and 140-142 are blank, though staves have been ruled throughout. There are generally 8 or 9 five-line but also 10 four and five-line red staves per page. In format Ma is the smallest of the four principal sources containing the music of the Notre Dame school, though the margins were cut down a little during binding. The notation is the typical square type of the Notre Dame school, and initials are written in blue or black on a red background, though they are not infrequently missing. The large initial F on f. 25 suggests that this may have been the beginning of the manuscript originally. Till it was transferred to the Biblioteca Nacional in 1869, Ma was the property of the Chapter of Toledo Cathedral, and it probably originated in Toledo if not in the cathedral itself. Anglès is quite definite about the Spanish origin of the codex. Riaño was the first to mention the ms in his Critical and Bibliographical Notes on Early Spanish Music (1887), 46 and Dreves published most of the texts together with two pieces of music in Analecta hymnica XX-XXI (1895). Aubry gave a complete description of the ms in 1907 and Ludwig was able to make use of Meyer's investigations for LudwigR. He placed the ms chronologically after W1 and F and before W2, which seems correct. He divided the ms into six large sections as follows : I, f. 1-4, a binio containing a conductus, a motet and 2 textless voices ; II, f. 5-24, 2 quinios containing 2 four-part motets and 3 four-part organa; III, f. 25-65, 5 quaternios with an added leaf f. 61, containing 22 two-part conductus; IV, f. 66-106, 5 quaternios with an added leaf f. 105, containing 20 two-part conductus and 8 motets; V, f. 107-122, 2 quaternios containing 10 two-part conductus, a motet and a three-part In seculum; VI, f. 123-142, 2 quinios containing 8 two-part conductus and 23 motets, the majority without T, some with Mot only and some with Tr and Mot only. The last fascicle is scarcely legible in some places due to the effect of humidity. It is noteworthy that Ma does not place motets and conductus in separate fascicles.

This information is reproduced here by kind permission of the publishers. It is COPYRIGHT and copying/reproduction of any of this content without permission may result in legal action.

Répertoire International des Sources Musicales
Loading inventory…

The inventory could not be loaded.

Sets

Select a set to see its sources.

denotes primary source study

Asensio Palacios, Juan Carlos (editor). 1997. El Códice de Madrid - Biblioteca Nacional, mss. 20486 : polifonías del siglo XII.  Madrid.

Dittmer, Luther A. 1960. Publications of Mediaeval Musical Manuscripts Il: Wolfenbüttel 1099. Publications of Mediaeval Music Manuscripts, vol. 2.  Brooklyn: Institute of Mediaeval Music. Pages: facsimile of Ma pieces in JF2.

Machabey, Armand. 1958. A propos des quadruples Pérotiniens. Musica Disciplina, 12: 3ff. Pages: 10, 16f (transcription of parts of no. 6), 21 f (transcription of no. 55).

Hughes, Dom Anselm. 1954-60. New Oxford History of Music. Pages: 330ff (transcription of no. 82).

Handschin, Jacques. 1952. Conductus-Spicilegien. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 9: 101ff. Pages: 117f.

Handschin, Jacques. 1949. The Summer Canon and its Background. Musica Disciplina, 3: 55-94, volume 5 (1951), 65-113. Pages: II, 95ff.

Anglès, Higinio, and José Subirá. 1946. Catálogo Musical de 1a Biblioteca Nacional de Madrid. I: Manuscritos. Catálogos de 1a Música antigua conservada en Espana.  Barcelona. Pages: I:149-151. Notes: description.

Ellinwood, Leonard. 1941. The Conductus. Musical Quarterly, 27: 165ff. Pages: 197ff, 200ff (transcription of nos. 61 and 67 after W1.

Husmann, Heinrich. 1940. Die drei- und vierstimmigen Notre-Dame-Organa. Pages: 10ff, 29ff, 139f, 137f (transcrip-tions of nos. 7-9 and 71).

Reese, Gustave. 1940. Music in the Middle Ages: With an introduction on the music of ancient times.  New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Pages: 297, 302ff, 312, 314, 325.

Gröninger, E. 1939. Repertoire-Untersuchungen zum mehrstim migen Notre-Dame-Conductus. Pages: 139ff and passim.

Husmann, Heinrich. 1937. Die Motetten der Madrider Handschrift und deren geschichtliche Stellung. Archiv für Musikforschung, 2: 173ff. Pages: 181ff (transcriptions of nos. 90, 94, 95, and 97-99).

Rokseth, Y. 1935+1939. Les Polyphonies du XIVe siecle. 4 vols. Pages: I-II, nos. 35, 63, 73, 44, 95, 36, 124, 39 (facsimile and transcription of nos. 55, 56, 71, 77, 84, 86, 87 and 89 after Mo; IV, 168, 170, 258 ff, 263, 268, 272.

Schmidt, Hans. 1933. Die drei- und vierstimmigen Organa.

Handschin, Jacques. 1932. Zur Geschichte von Notre Dame. Acta Musicologica, 4: 5ffand49ff. Pages: 6f.

Schneider, Màrius. 1932. Zur Satztechnik der Notre-Dame-Schule. Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft, 14: 398ff.

Anglès, Higinio. 1931. El Còdex musical de las Huelgas. 3 vols. Pages: II-III, nos. 147, 146, 155, 98, 131, 153, 154, 105, 83, 93, 86, 94, 95, 115, 116, 102 (facsimile and transcription of nos. 36, 37, second part of 47, 57, 58, 64, 68, 72, 85-88, 91, 92, 96 and 101 after Hu); I, 71 ff and passim.

Ludwig, Friedrich (editor). 1930. Über den Entstehungsort der großen „Notre-Dame-Handschriften". Festschrift für Guido Adler zum 65 Geburtstag, 45ff. Pages: 46f.

Ficker, Rudolf von. 1930. Musik der Gotik: Perotinus, Sederunt principes. Pages: transcription of no. 8.

Ludwig, Friedrich. 1923. Die Quellen der Motetten ältesten Stils. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 5: 185-222, Vol. 5 (1924) 273-315. Pages: 187, 189f, 193, 199, 209, 211, 279, 290f, 293, 305, 309.

Ludwig, Friedrich. 1910. Repertorium organorum recentioris et motetorum vetustissimi stili. I. Catalogue raisonné. 1. Handschriften in Quadratnotation.  Halle: Niemayer. Pages: 125ff and passim.

Aubry, Pierre. 1908. Cent Motets du XIIIe siècle. 3 vols. Pages: I-II, nos. 104, 44, 7, 62, 74 (facsimile and transcription of nos. 71, 75, 78, 84 and 86 after Ba); III, 16, 20, 63, 79, 92, 97.

Aubry, Pierre. 1907. Iter Hispanicum. Sammelbände der internationalen Musikgesellschaft, 8: 337. Pages: 349, 351, 353 (transcription of nos. 54, end of 75, and 78); 339ff.

Wooldridge, Harry Ellis. 1901. Oxford History of Music I.  Oxford: Clarendon. Pages: I, 365f (facsimile and transcription of no. 59 after F), 360 (transcription of no. 75 after F), 358 (transcription of no. 80 after F), 373 (transcription of no. 89.

Riaño, Juan F. 1887. Critical and Bibliographical Notes on Early Spanish Music.  London: Quaritch. Pages: 46. Notes: mention of ms.

This form is used to make comments on a source. If you wish to notify us of a correction to the record, you should use the "Contribute a change" form instead.

No comments have been made.

Contributions to this record are recorded here. If you wish to contribute information or a correction to this record, use the "Contribute a Change" link. This will then be reviewed by DIAMM staff and, if accepted, your contribution will be acknowledged here.

Anna Grau Schmidt

Thursday, 12 August, 2021

bibliography updated

Répertoire Internationale des Sources Musicales

Monday, 23 January, 2017

NB: Migrated from old site. Credit for notes may not be completely accurate. RISM Description