D-W Cod. Guelf. 1099 Helmst. (W2)

Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenbüttel, Germany

manuscript of early Notre Dame polyphony: 13th century

Archive Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenbüttel, Germany (D-W)
Shelfmark Cod. Guelf. 1099 Helmst. (W2)
Image Availability DIAMM does not have images of this source. Please refer to the external links for image availability.
Surface Parchment
Numbering System Foliation
Measurements 175 x 130 mm
Other Identifiers
  • RISM: W2
Notations
  • Notre Dame
Relationships
External Links
Provenance
  • France
Contents Contains 296 compositions, 6 from 1 composer, 290 are anonymous.
General Description

Although this MS is perhaps the latest of the four principal Notre Dame sources, it was almost certainly written in France. It contains not only two-, three- and four-part organa, but also conductus and a huge collection of motets. Only the clausulae are not in this codex, perhaps because the motet was well developed by this time.

Ludwig traces 3 different hands in the 10 fascicles (1 for the organa in fascicles I-V, 1 for the two-part conductus in fascicle VI, and 1 for the motets in fascicles VII-X). The parchment too is different in fascicle VI. The codex is made up as follows : fasc. 1 (f. 1-5v) : 2 (originally 3) four-part organa; fasc. 2 (f. 6-30v): 12 three-part organa; fasc. 3 (f. 31-46v): 10 three-part conductus; fase. 4-5 (f. 47-91v) : 50 two-part organa; fasc. 6 (f. 92-122v) : 12 two-part conductus; fasc. 7 (f. 123-144v): 17 three-part motets and 8 conductus; fasc. 8 (f. 145-192v) : 1st alphabet of 20 two-part motets, 2nd alphabet of 1 three-part and 26 two-part motets with 4 isolated motet voices from the four part organa, 3rd alphabet of 1 three-part and 28 two-part motets, appendix of 7 two-part motets; fasc. 9 (f. 193-215v): 1 four-part, 1 two-part and 21 three-part polytextual French motets; fasc. 10 (f. 216-253v): 91 two-part motets.

W2 came into the library at Wolfenbüttel from the library of Flacius Illyricus in 1597 (see W1).

DIAMM, 2017
Extent

Most of the gatherings are quaternios, some of which have been however rendered incomplete in the course of time. Fasc. 1 is now 3 single sheets (f. 1-3) plus a bifolio (f. 4-5). The second quaternio of fasc. 2 has a single sheet extra in the middle. Fasc. 5 ends with a mixed gathering consisting of a bifolio (f. 87 and 91), a single sheet (f. 90) and 2 smaller empty leaves (f. 88 and 89). The final page is missing for the last quaternio of fasc. 6, while gathering 2 of fasc. 7 now lacks the middle bifolio. In fasc. 9, what was originally the third quaternio is now arranged as (i) a single sheet (f. 209) with a corresponding stub on f. 216, (ii) a bifolio (f. 210-211), the second folio only retaining its upper part and being wrongly bound between f. 210 and 212 and foliated 211, while the unwritten lower half appears as a stub (f. 215), (iii) 2 bifolios (f. 212 to 215) in the middle.

DIAMM, 2022
Binding

modern brown leather

DIAMM, 2017
Notation

Notre Dame, without even long and breve differentiation

DIAMM, 2017
Ruling

number of staves per page varies from 8 to 10 of the red five- or occasionally four-line variety.

DIAMM, 2017
Foliation

modern pencil foliation at t.r.r

DIAMM, 2017
Decoration

Several fascicles begin with an illuminated miniature, fascicle 3 with an illustration of 3 singers and fasc. 4 with one of 4. Initials are as usual red or blue with contrasting filigree.

DIAMM, 2017
Surface

parchment

DIAMM, 2017
RISM Description

RISM B/IV 1: A 13th century parchment manuscript meas. 175 x 130 mm. and containing 253 folios. The foliation at t.r.r. is of modern pencil, and the brown leather binding is also relatively recent. Although it is perhaps the latest of the four principal Notre Dame sources, it has the advantage of having been almost certainly written in France. Moreover, its repertory is vast, containing not only two-, three- and four-part organa, but also conductus and a huge collection of motets. Only the clausulae are not in this codex, perhaps because the motet was well developed by this time. W2 came into the library at Wolfenbüttel from the library of Flacius Illyricus in 1597 (see W1). The notation is still of Notre Dame type without even long and breve differentiation. The number of staves per page varies from 8 to 10 of the red five- or occasionally four-line variety. Ludwig traces 3 different hands in the 10 fascicles (1 for the organa in fascicles I-V, 1 for the two-part conductus in fascicle VI, and 1 for the motets in fascicles VII-X). The parchment too is different in fascicle VI. The codex is made up as follows : fasc. 1 (f. 1-5v) : 2 (originally 3) four-part organa; fasc. 2 (f. 6-30v): 12 three-part organa; fasc. 3 (f. 31-46v): 10 three-part conductus; fase. 4-5 (f. 47-91v) : 50 two-part organa; fasc. 6 (f. 92-122v) : 12 two-part conductus; fasc. 7 (f. 123-144v): 17 three-part motets and 8 conductus; fasc. 8 (f. 145-192v) : 1st alphabet of 20 two-part motets, 2nd alphabet of 1 three-part and 26 two-part motets with 4 isolated motet voices from the four part organa, 3rd alphabet of 1 three-part and 28 two-part motets, appendix of 7 two-part motets; fasc. 9 (f. 193-215v): 1 four-part, 1 two-part and 21 three-part polytextual French motets; fasc. 10 (f. 216-253v): 91 two-part motets. Most of the gatherings are quaternios, some of which have been however rendered incomplete in the course of time. Fasc. 1 is now 3 single sheets (f. 1-3) plus a bifolio (f. 4-5). The second quaternio of fasc. 2 has a single sheet extra in the middle. Fasc. 5 ends with a mixed gathering consisting of a bifolio (f. 87 and 91), a single sheet (f. 90) and 2 smaller empty leaves (f. 88 and 89). The final page is missing for the last quaternio of fasc. 6, while gathering 2 of fasc. 7 now lacks the middle bifolio. In fasc. 9, what was originally the third quaternio is now arranged as (i) a single sheet (f. 209) with a corresponding stub on f. 216, (ii) a bifolio (f. 210-211), the second folio only retaining its upper part and being wrongly bound between f. 210 and 212 and foliated 211, while the unwritten lower half appears as a stub (f. 215), (iii) 2 bifolios (f. 212 to 215) in the middle. Several fascicles begin with an illuminated miniature, fascicle 3 with an illustration of 3 singers and fasc. 4 with one of 4. Initials are as usual red or blue with contrasting filigree.

This information is reproduced here by kind permission of the publishers. It is COPYRIGHT and copying/reproduction of any of this content without permission may result in legal action.

Répertoire International des Sources Musicales
Loading inventory…

The inventory could not be loaded.

Sets

Select a set to see its sources.

denotes primary source study

Thurston, E (editor). 1970. The Works of Perotin.  New York. Pages: (transcription of all W2 conductus).

Davison, Archibald Thompson, and Willi Apel (editors). 1966. Historical Anthology of Music. Vol. I. Oriental, Medieval and Renaissance Music.  Cambridge, Massachusetts. Pages: nos. 28f and 32c (transcriptions of W2167 and 90).

Dittmer, Luther A. 1960. Publications of Mediaeval Musical Manuscripts Il: Wolfenbüttel 1099. Publications of Mediaeval Music Manuscripts, vol. 2.  Brooklyn: Institute of Mediaeval Music. Pages: (complete facsimile).

Dittmer, Luther A. 1959. Publications of Mediaeval Musical Manuscripts IlI: Eine zentrale Quelle der Notre Dame-Musik. Publications of Mediaeval Musical Manuscripts, vol. 3.  Brooklyn: Institute of Mediaeval Music. Pages: 142ff, 160, 161f, 169, 173f, 177f, 182, 183f, 185f, 186ff, 201, 202ff (transcription of W2 227, 251, 300, 174 + 215, 161, 282, 303, 137, 138).

Zaminer, Frieder. 1959. Der Vatikanische Organum-Traktat (Ottob. lat. 3025). Pages: 22f, 32, 34ff, 72, 159.

Gennrich, Friedrich. 1958. Bibliographie der ältesten französischen und lateinischen Motetten. Pages: XXXVff etc.

Machabey, Armand. 1958. A propos des quadruples Pérotiniens. Musica Disciplina, 12: 3ff.

Waite, W. 1954. The Rhythm of Twelfth Century Polyphony. Pages: appendix (the complete transcription of the two-part organa of the Magnus liber organi after W1 includes W2 25-28, 33, 34, 36-38, 40-42, 44-46, 48-53, 57-59, 63- 67 and 69).

Auda, Antoine. 1953. Les "Motets Wallons" du manuscrit de Turin: Vari 42. 2 vols. Pages: I-II (facsimile and transcription of all W2 works in Tu after this source); I.

Handschin, Jacques. 1952. Zur Frage der Conductus-Rhythmik. Acta Musicologica, 24: 113ff. Pages: 115.

Apel, Willi. 1942. (4th ed., 1949). The Notation of Polyphonic Music 900-1600.  Cambridge, Massachusetts. Pages: 201, 217, 231ff, 274f, 279ff.

Ellinwood, Leonard. 1941. The Conductus. Musical Quarterly, 27: 165ff. Pages: nos. VI-VIII (transcription of W2 22, 17 and 83).

Husmann, Heinrich. 1940. Die drei- und vierstimmigen Notre-Dame-Organa. Pages: organa nos. I, 2, 5, 6, 13 19 21 22, 25, 27, 28 and clausula no. 7 (transcription of W2 3, 4, 1, 7, 11, 8, 6, 5, 12, 13, 14 and 2); introduction.

Gröninger, E. 1939. Repertoire-Untersuchungen zum mehrstim migen Notre-Dame-Conductus. Pages: 155ff and passim.

Kujlmann, G. 1938. Die zweistimmigen französischen Motetten des Kodex Montpellier, Faculté de Médecine H196. 2 vols. Pages: I, II, nos. 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 191, 192, 193, 194, 201 203 209, 210, 216, 220, 221, 225, 232, 241, 244, 248, 249, 252 (transcription of W2 223, 312' 253, 271, 234 + 197, 274, 263, 257, 222 + 181, 262, 279 +186, 232, 275 + 192, 267, 269, 231, 251 + 182, 228 + 189, 301 + 179, 293, 297, 240, 292, 248 + 193, 261, 247 and 264).

Husmann, Heinrich. 1936. Die Offiziumsorgana der Notre-Dame-Zeit. Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters, 42: 31ff.

Rokseth, Y. 1935+1939. Les Polyphonies du XIVe siecle. 4 vols. Pages: I-III (facsimile and transcription of all W2 works in Mo after that source); IV, 72 and passim.

Husmann, Heinrich. 1935. Die dreistimmigen Organa der Notre-Dame-Schule.

Schmidt, Hans. 1933. Die drei- und vierstimmigen Organa.

Schmidt, Hans. 1932. Zur Melodiebildung Léonins und Perotins. Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft, 14: 129ff. Pages: 113ff.

Anglès, Higinio. 1931. El Còdex musical de las Huelgas. 3 vols. Pages: II-III (facsimile and transcription of all W2 works in Hu after this source); I, 219 ff, 323 and passim.

Ficker, Rudolf von. 1930. Musik der Gotik: Perotinus, Sederunt principes. Pages: (transcription of W2 1).

Besseler, Heinrich. 1926. Studien zur Musik des Mittelalters: II. Die Motette von Franko von Köln bis Philipp van Vitry. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 8: 137-258. Pages: II.

Ludwig, Friedrich. 1923. Die Quellen der Motetten ältesten Stils. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 5: 185-222, Vol. 5 (1924) 273-315.

Ludwig, Friedrich. 1910. Repertorium organorum recentioris et motetorum vetustissimi stili. I. Catalogue raisonné. 1. Handschriften in Quadratnotation.  Halle: Niemayer. Pages: 157ff and passim.

Ludwig, Friedrich. 1909. Die liturgischen Organa Léonins und Perotins. Riemann-Festschrift: Gesammelte Studien--Hugo Riemann zum sechzigsten Geburtstage überreicht von Freunden und Schülern, 200ff. Leipzig. Pages: 203f, 208ff.

Aubry, Pierre. 1908. Cent Motets du XIIIe siècle. 3 vols. Pages: I-II (facsimile and transcription of all W2 works in Ba after this source); III.

This form is used to make comments on a source. If you wish to notify us of a correction to the record, you should use the "Contribute a change" form instead.

No comments have been made.

Contributions to this record are recorded here. If you wish to contribute information or a correction to this record, use the "Contribute a Change" link. This will then be reviewed by DIAMM staff and, if accepted, your contribution will be acknowledged here.

Thibaut Guyot

Wednesday, 11 September, 2024

'Beata viscera' (attr. Perotin) is on f.156v, (Added to inventory)

DIAMM, 2016

Monday, 23 January, 2017

NB: Migrated from old site. Credit for notes may not be completely accurate. General Description; Binding Note; Notation Note; Ruling Note; Foliation Note; Decoration Note; Surface Note

Répertoire Internationale des Sources Musicales

Monday, 23 January, 2017

NB: Migrated from old site. Credit for notes may not be completely accurate. RISM Description